The Tuning Protocol The Tuning Protocol helps educators and students 'fine tune' their practice using a formal process 'Tuning Protocols are an excellent way to examine bodies of work colaboratively' Tuning Protocols basically work like this: * A presenter offers something for the group to examine and asks one to three questions about the work in order to focus the group. * Participants then ask questions to clarify their understanding of the work. Cont'd * Participants and presenter then write for a few minutes about the work focusing on the key questions.

* Participants engage in discussion about the work for a sustained period of time without interruption from the presenter, who listens and takes notes. * The presenter then reflects on the notes he or she took while the participants talked. The participants listen without interrupting the presenters reflection. * The presenter and participants hold a debriefing session about the effectiveness of the tuning meeting and continue the discussion. Steps of a Tuning Protocol: 1.

Hercules Game Theater Driver Windows 7. We explain Critical Friends as a Best Practices in Peer to Peer Feedback with video tutorials and quizzes, using our Many Ways(TM) approach from multiple teachers.

Introduction (10 minutes) 2. Packet Generator. Presentation (15 minutes) 3. Clarifying Questions (5 minutes) 4.

Acer Veriton L410 Service Manual Software. Individual Writing (5 minutes) 5. Participant Discussion (15 minutes) 6. Presenter Reflection (15 minutes) 7. Debriefing (10 minutes) Types of Feeback: Warm Feedback: Statements that let the presenter know what is working (praise). Cool Feedback: Statements or questions that help the presenter move forward (they are not so much criticism, but rather critique).

The best cool feedback occurs through 'What if' questions such as, ' I wonder what would happen if.

Critical Friends: Collaborating as Writers Transcript Teacher [in class]: I just want to check in with you. We're ready to do some collaborating as writers. Teacher [in interview]: Hi. This is David Olio from South Windsor. This is my AP literature class and we, today are examining text through collaboration as writers.

Our focus novel's Tony Morrison's Beloved. Students had wrestled with a passage and completed a piece of writing. Ultimately, the purpose is for the writer to make decisions to revise their own work. Teacher [in class]: What we're going to be doing, of course is working with our critical friends group - which means writer as fly on the wall. You're outside of the conversation. And that we actually have a conversation. I use critical friends as a peer review model.

This means that the writer remains in silent. The writer is not a part of the conversation whatsoever simply a note-taker or what we call a witness. [00:01:09.07] Teacher [in interview]: Here are steps today to have collaborative discussions around work - I'd like you to first select a writer's work. Can you do that right now?